Author Services
Author Articles

Book Review & Contest Insights from Real Reviews and Submissions
What separates great books from the rest? Below are articles with insights from real reviews and contest submissions—what works, what doesn’t, and how to improve your book. You’ll also find a wide range of articles covering writing, publishing, marketing, and more. Each article has a Comments section so you can read advice from other authors and leave your own.
Why Some Books Win Awards (And Most Don’t) — Insights From Real Contest Submissions New!
What separates award-winning books from the rest? After evaluating contest submissions across a wide range of genres, certain patterns become clear. Some books consistently rise to the top. Others, even with strong ideas and clear effort behind them, fall short. The difference is rarely dramatic—it...
What We’ve Learned From Reviewing Hundreds of Thousands of Books (And Why Most Don’t Stand Out) New!
After reviewing and evaluating books across thousands of submissions over the past two decades, certain patterns become impossible to ignore. Some books immediately stand out to reviewers. Others—even well-intentioned ones—fade into the middle or fall short. The difference is rarely luck. It comes down to...
Understanding Cognitive Psychology and its Research Methods
In my “Need for Psychology Understanding” article, I wrote about how almost all fiction writers need at least a basic understanding of psychology in order to write realistic content, dialogues, characters, and relationships. A lack of psychology understanding also sometimes causes writers to use a psychology word incorrectly or to describe it incorrectly to readers. This confusion can easily be avoided with a bit of psychology research. One area that many writers struggle with is cognitive psychology and the research methods used by cognitive psychologists.
Cognitive psychology is a field of psychology that focuses on the study of thought; these studies include people's perception of the world through their senses, attention processes, memory operation, language processes, decision-making processes, and brain activity that controls cognitive psychology processes (McBride & Cutting, 2019). Researchers in this field have different research methods that they can utilize in their study of this field of study.
Two such research methods are the scientific method and the experimental method. The scientific method is best utilized for gaining knowledge in a field of study that relies on the observations of phenomena and is based upon four main principles: empiricism, determinism, testability, and parsimony (McBride & Cutting, 2016). These four principles mean that the scientific method is based on understanding phenomena through systematic observation, the idea that behaviors have underlying causes, the principle that theories must be formatted in a manner in which allows for testing through observation, and a preference for simple explanations over complex ones (McBride & Cutting, 2016). The experimental research method, also known as the experimental approach, is designed to simplify the contexts surrounding the behavior of interest, thus allowing for a focused investigation of the impact of a small set of variables (McBride & Cutting, 2019). An experimental study allows researchers to actively manipulate the independent and control variables.
The scientific and experimental research method allows researchers to form hypotheses, test theories, and study behavior. Yet the methods differ in how the study is conducted as the scientific method relies on systematic observation while the experimental method allows the researcher to manipulate variables and to have experimental and control groups for comparisons. Both methods are equally useful as the two methods each are best suited for answering different types of research questions.
An example of a research study conducted using the experimental research method was the study conducted by Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1963) to test the hypothesis that exposure of children to film-mediated aggressive models would increase the probability of participant’s aggression to subsequent frustrations three experimental groups and one control group. The research subjects in the experimental groups all witnessed a different form of aggressive behavior (cartoon, live person, and a recording of a person on a TV) they then spent time in a room with objects that would allow them to imitate the behavior that they witnessed.
References
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1037/h0048687
McBride, D., & Cutting, J. (2016). Cognitive Psychology Interactive: Theory, Process, and Methodology. SAGE Publications.
McBride, D., & Cutting, J. (2019). Cognitive Psychology Interactive: Theory, Process, and Methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Written by Readers’ Favorite Reviewer Sefina Hawke